All content on this site is copyright 2023, by FRED PAHLKE.
Hillary Clinton is not for America....she is the most evil politician
"I mean, we had very strong partisans in both parties in the past and we had very bitter battles over all kinds of things: gun control, and climate change, and the economy, and taxes. But there wasn’t this little tail of extremism wagging the dog of the Republican Party as it is today, and sadly, so many of those extremists, those MAGA extremists, take their marching orders from Donald Trump, who has no credibility left by any measure. He’s only in it for himself. He’s now defending himself in civil actions and criminal actions, and when do they break with him? You know, because at some point, you know, maybe there needs to be a formal deprogramming of the cult members. But something needs to happen."
So Clinton wants to deprogram 80 million Americans that do not go with her take on Trump and MAGA? What is she really telling half of the American citizens? She is actually telling them that they need to be brainwashed into her political and social belief system or else. Or else she and her followers will do to these 80 million Americans what the Nazi Party and their followers did the those that did not partake in their agenda? Is she willing to fucking kill the lot of them. I personally think yes, she would. I consider Clinton just another Adolf Hitler sort that has the morals of the fucking Lucifer in Hell. She is pure evil and would stop at nothing in taking Trump and his follows, or matter of fact, any American that does bow down to her thinking, out. And yes, this less than righteous woman will do it if given the chance. Does she want to deprogram or just kill? You figure it out but she could be coming after you if she gets her way.
All content on this site is copyright by FRED PAHLKE. Any posts to FACEBOOK is strickly prohibited. That goes for any other social media. Reproduction is strickly prohibited.
So Clinton wants to deprogram 80 million Americans that do not go with her take on Trump and MAGA? What is she really telling half of the American citizens? She is actually telling them that they need to be brainwashed into her political and social belief system or else. Or else she and her followers will do to these 80 million Americans what the Nazi Party and their followers did the those that did not partake in their agenda? Is she willing to fucking kill the lot of them. I personally think yes, she would. I consider Clinton just another Adolf Hitler sort that has the morals of the fucking Lucifer in Hell. She is pure evil and would stop at nothing in taking Trump and his follows, or matter of fact, any American that does bow down to her thinking, out. And yes, this less than righteous woman will do it if given the chance. Does she want to deprogram or just kill? You figure it out but she could be coming after you if she gets her way.
All content on this site is copyright by FRED PAHLKE. Any posts to FACEBOOK is strickly prohibited. That goes for any other social media. Reproduction is strickly prohibited.
All content on this site is copyright by FRED PAHLKE. Any posts to FACEBOOK is strickly prohibited.
President Joe Biden-a fucking piece of shit with NO MORAL BACKBONE
the United States is being fucked by President Biden and his administration....America is in big trouble with almost everything happening today......
Trump and new women Congress members tangle with words.....
President Trump does not like United States Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts. Is that understandable? Hell yes it is. What in the fuck is there to like about these four Congress members? Yet, their constituents voted them in office and that makes them legitimate as far as the law of this country goes.
But let us get something straight. These four women are anti-American, anti-Semitic, racist, and misandric. You can argue these labels all you want if you disagree. Trump's call for them to "go back home" is pure Trump bullshit. If you think the President is RACIST for making that comment that is alright also. You will never be convinced that the POTUS is not a full racist if I tried. Sure, believe it all you want. I could not give a flying fuck if you do. But if you are reading this, you are probably agreeing with me. If not, I am ok with it.
Let me be clear. Trump makes comments like he did with these four as to rile up the Democrat Party and get an argument on the books with them. The more the Democrat Party supports the ultra-liberal ideas professed by these four women and their followers ups his chance to be re-elected in 2020. Will the voting public support a Communist agenda in 2020? What do you think? And do not get confused. If the likes of these four ever get the power they want to make the US into what they want, all hell will break loose and this country is doomed.
But let us get something straight. These four women are anti-American, anti-Semitic, racist, and misandric. You can argue these labels all you want if you disagree. Trump's call for them to "go back home" is pure Trump bullshit. If you think the President is RACIST for making that comment that is alright also. You will never be convinced that the POTUS is not a full racist if I tried. Sure, believe it all you want. I could not give a flying fuck if you do. But if you are reading this, you are probably agreeing with me. If not, I am ok with it.
Let me be clear. Trump makes comments like he did with these four as to rile up the Democrat Party and get an argument on the books with them. The more the Democrat Party supports the ultra-liberal ideas professed by these four women and their followers ups his chance to be re-elected in 2020. Will the voting public support a Communist agenda in 2020? What do you think? And do not get confused. If the likes of these four ever get the power they want to make the US into what they want, all hell will break loose and this country is doomed.
FACEBOOK BANNED ME FOR THREE DAYS FOR "HATE" COMMENT
APRIL 12, 2019
ALL POSTS COPYRIGHT BY FRED PAHLKE - Do not post this or any of my work on any other platform, such as FACEBOOK. Comments are welcomed below
On April 11, 2019, at around 11 am, FACEBOOK banned me from making comments and doing most all interaction as of a story I had put up on Osama Bin Lauden. I appealed Facebook, knowing that this platform does not use REAL people in appeals and that the appeal would be useless. No matter, I did ask what the problem with my post was and Facebook only replied that the ban was final. The initial ban was said for my HATE SPEECH on a post, a recent post. When checking the post, it was put on my Facebook in November of 2014. So much for being recent. Facebook banned me for something I had posted five years ago.
My feeling is that I had someone get upset with a later post, quite possibly in the past few days, and decided to report me on something to Facebook. I believe that. Being a conservative person, I believe I pissed off someone, quite possibly a Facebook friend and that person did the reporting. Also, with Facebook having a habit of "messing" with conservatives, I am sure I was an excellent target to get shut down. I cannot prove it, but this ban was totally wrong in my opinion, and now I fear that I will suffer another ban in the future, as anything you post at any time you posted it can be used against you with their rules and regulations. My post in 2014 was a reposting of a national story from USA-Today. So that newspaper is a publisher of HATE SPEECH?
You will not see this negative post about FACEBOOK on that platform, knowing that it would give them another opportunity to shit on me. So I post it here for my dot com readers, and that is fine with me.
I will end this post with some insight about social media platforms such as FACEBOOK. If you are of a conservative mind they do not like your speech, they will shut you down. FACEBOOK is run my people that have a mindset that gives them powers over their users that will in the end hurt this country as we get through the hard political times we are in. As we have a First Amendment right of free speech, that is not practiced on Facebook, and I understand that. .
I do not respect these media people
I do not respect this man.
Lawrence O'Donnell
This Woman would allow the Abortion of a 7 lb. Fetus
-So Says Her Democratic Party-
Wasserman Schultz Is Sick in the Head and so are the Democrats
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
How can anyone justify the abortion of a child that could be born alive? What in humanity does it take to be such a cold and creepy individual? Brain washed disguised as pure evil? Or just plain out to lunch? You tell me. I can't figure it out but then how do societies throughout history justify murder, genocide, and out and out destruction of the human being? Wasserman-Schultz is a real piece of work. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/rand-paul-battles-debbie-wasserman-schultz-on-abortion-116782.html
Rand Paul battles Debbie Wasserman Schultz on abortionBy Kendall Breitman
4/8/15 6:27 PM EDT
Updated 4/9/15 12:01 PM EDT
Rand Paul and Debbie Wasserman Schultz spent the Kentucky senator’s first day on the presidential campaign trail fighting about abortion.
Early Wednesday, Paul refused to tell The Associated Press whether he would support exceptions for abortions in instances of rape or incest or if the birth of a child would risk the mother’s life.
“The thing is about abortion — and about a lot of things — is that I think people get tied up in all these details of, sort of, you’re this or this or that, or you’re hard and fast [on] one thing or the other,” Paul told the AP.
Later in the day, when pressed on the question by a New Hampshire journalist, Paul responded, “Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it OK to kill a 7-pound baby in the uterus?”
“You go back and go ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby that’s just not born yet,” Paul told reporters. “Ask her when life begins, and ask Debbie when she’s willing to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, come back to me.”
Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, quickly fired back at Paul with a fiery statement sent through the DNC.
“Here’s an answer,” said Schultz, a representative from Florida. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’?
“And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ‘shushing’ me,” she added, a reference to Paul’s past encounters with reporters.
The Kentucky Republican obliged in an appearance on CNN late Wednesday afternoon but said Wasserman Schultz has “got some explaining to do.”
“It sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby,” Paul said.
“Debbie’s position, which I guess is the Democratic Party’s position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine, I really think most pro-choice people would be uncomfortable with that,” he continued.
In the past, Paul has supported some legislation that calls for exceptions for incest and rape, and at other times has backed legislation that does not offer the exceptions. When pressed by CNN on his current position on exceptions, his answer was a little less pointed.
“Basically my point of view is that anything that puts forward and develops and says ‘You know what, there is something special about life, and there’s a role for government,’ I’ve supported,” Paul said. “That’s been a variety of things both with exceptions and without.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/rand-paul-battles-debbie-wasserman-schultz-on-abortion-116782.html#ixzz3XcYEniNM
Rand Paul battles Debbie Wasserman Schultz on abortionBy Kendall Breitman
4/8/15 6:27 PM EDT
Updated 4/9/15 12:01 PM EDT
Rand Paul and Debbie Wasserman Schultz spent the Kentucky senator’s first day on the presidential campaign trail fighting about abortion.
Early Wednesday, Paul refused to tell The Associated Press whether he would support exceptions for abortions in instances of rape or incest or if the birth of a child would risk the mother’s life.
“The thing is about abortion — and about a lot of things — is that I think people get tied up in all these details of, sort of, you’re this or this or that, or you’re hard and fast [on] one thing or the other,” Paul told the AP.
Later in the day, when pressed on the question by a New Hampshire journalist, Paul responded, “Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it OK to kill a 7-pound baby in the uterus?”
“You go back and go ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby that’s just not born yet,” Paul told reporters. “Ask her when life begins, and ask Debbie when she’s willing to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, come back to me.”
Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, quickly fired back at Paul with a fiery statement sent through the DNC.
“Here’s an answer,” said Schultz, a representative from Florida. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’?
“And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ‘shushing’ me,” she added, a reference to Paul’s past encounters with reporters.
The Kentucky Republican obliged in an appearance on CNN late Wednesday afternoon but said Wasserman Schultz has “got some explaining to do.”
“It sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby,” Paul said.
“Debbie’s position, which I guess is the Democratic Party’s position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine, I really think most pro-choice people would be uncomfortable with that,” he continued.
In the past, Paul has supported some legislation that calls for exceptions for incest and rape, and at other times has backed legislation that does not offer the exceptions. When pressed by CNN on his current position on exceptions, his answer was a little less pointed.
“Basically my point of view is that anything that puts forward and develops and says ‘You know what, there is something special about life, and there’s a role for government,’ I’ve supported,” Paul said. “That’s been a variety of things both with exceptions and without.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/rand-paul-battles-debbie-wasserman-schultz-on-abortion-116782.html#ixzz3XcYEniNM
Let's Do It Again Citizens,
First It Was Color
Now Vote In a new President Because of the Gender of the Candidate
Hillary Clinton is expected to begin her 2016 campaign for president with a video message on Sunday. Credit Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press
With Hilary Clinton and her run for President, I might or might not vote for her. That is not the point I am going to try to get across. Hillary's campaign will push her for President because they want us to know "isn't it time for a woman to be President?" My God, here we go again. When will the American voting public make a choice for President that has nothing to do with the color of a persons skin, the sex organs of the person, the psychological sexual favoritism of said individual, and physical looks/sexiness of the person, and JUST VOTE FOR THE PERSON THAT THEY THINK CAN BE THE BEST PRESIDENT FOR THE COUNTRY IN THEIR OPINION
Many of my friends, my readers, my family, will not agree with me on the following statements. But in truth, I believe what I am going say is based on more than a feeling. First, the voting public that picks a President because of skin color and not qualifications is a borderline racist, if not a full out and out one. Second, picking a President on the gender of the person, male or female, is being a sexist, plain and simple. And thirdly, voting because of sexual preference, gay or straight, is another form of picking someone for President that has no good outcome, again if the choice is solely because of that preference. I will add religious preference, and include whether said candidate is a believer or not. Picking a President because he is Catholic, Jew, atheist, Methodist, heathen.........can be a bad thing. Often, people elected with limited agenda's do not see the big picture and are not good choices for the highest office. Want examples? No, you know them (unless you are just plain stupid-and they litter both sides of the political spectrum. Please, do not confuse this with natural preferences, such as I will vote for this person because he believes in "life", or "choice", or "gay rights", or "freedom for all", or "gun control".....etc....These are legitimate reasons for voting for a person but try to look at the person as a complete President, one that is not all consumed with one item while in the White House.
It is time in this country to vote the person and with regard to beliefs and qualifications, not skin color or the junk between the legs. Lets get the best person elected by majority, and that could include Hillary. But vote for her because she is not a women. That is disingenuous, even if she and her handlers don't know it. It's also disrespectful toward the office of the President of the United States.
Many of my friends, my readers, my family, will not agree with me on the following statements. But in truth, I believe what I am going say is based on more than a feeling. First, the voting public that picks a President because of skin color and not qualifications is a borderline racist, if not a full out and out one. Second, picking a President on the gender of the person, male or female, is being a sexist, plain and simple. And thirdly, voting because of sexual preference, gay or straight, is another form of picking someone for President that has no good outcome, again if the choice is solely because of that preference. I will add religious preference, and include whether said candidate is a believer or not. Picking a President because he is Catholic, Jew, atheist, Methodist, heathen.........can be a bad thing. Often, people elected with limited agenda's do not see the big picture and are not good choices for the highest office. Want examples? No, you know them (unless you are just plain stupid-and they litter both sides of the political spectrum. Please, do not confuse this with natural preferences, such as I will vote for this person because he believes in "life", or "choice", or "gay rights", or "freedom for all", or "gun control".....etc....These are legitimate reasons for voting for a person but try to look at the person as a complete President, one that is not all consumed with one item while in the White House.
It is time in this country to vote the person and with regard to beliefs and qualifications, not skin color or the junk between the legs. Lets get the best person elected by majority, and that could include Hillary. But vote for her because she is not a women. That is disingenuous, even if she and her handlers don't know it. It's also disrespectful toward the office of the President of the United States.
The Nation Sure Does Miss This Man
The nation doesn't have what it currently needs to help solve the racial problems that many blacks believe we have. With the terrible situation in Ferguson, Missouri currently dominating the psyche of the American black, the black leadership brought forth has not met the needs of this significant minority of our society. The day Dr. Martin Luther King died the hopes and dreams of many in this country took a direct hit. In reality the soul of this country's civil rights movement died. From that day to this, black leadership has wavered into actions that in fact, have not helped the black men and women in the USA and in fact, have been more of a determent to this group. With many still struggling in the emptiness of desolation and poverty, black leadership is without a real plan to make the experience of their fellow man a positive and productive one. Just look at the rotting cities such as Detroit that have a large black majority, the huge jobs discrepancy between blacks and other groups, and the poor learning statistics of the black students and you can see such a failure of ideas and leadership from national leaders down to state and city leaders. It is such a sad story. Expectations six years ago with the election of the new black President have done nothing to help the black man, as liberalism has in fact, caused extreme hard ache and added destructive policies to fuel a moral downfall of many black families, including young men and women. Respect for self cannot be found in many black children, fathers of such children cannot be found for many black children, and a way out of the dread cannot be realized by many black children, the direct result a black leadership pool that cares more about decisive and corrupt actions rather than bright and invigorating ideas needed for improvement of the situation. Not until another leader in the same class as MLK will the situation become suffer-able. The hate and blood letting violence in Ferguson will continue, hopefully not for long. Let's pray that the real and compassionate MLK successor has been born and is on the horizon to lead, for the blackman, the white man, and the everyday American. We all need this to come to pass.
Chris Matthews Says Romney Using the RACE CARD
Have you ever run across someone who says something bad about someone else and truth to be that the person complaining actually has the same behavior or problem that the person he is upset with? MSNBC's Chris Matthews is sprewing the notion that Mitt Ronmey is using the "RACE CARD" in this Presidental Election. In reality Chris Matthews is using th RACE CARD with this acusation on the Romney campaign, and shame on him for doing so. Matthews is a noted commontator but he is just an
tool for the President. In fact, he seem like to be in love with our President. Let the tickles keep running down his leg. Come on Mr. Matthews, you are worse than Sean Hannity, and that is saying something.
tool for the President. In fact, he seem like to be in love with our President. Let the tickles keep running down his leg. Come on Mr. Matthews, you are worse than Sean Hannity, and that is saying something.
Some Recent Post on My Facebook
August 10:
Mitt Romney-It's too late for the GOP to pick someone else to run against the
President. If the Romney campaign doesn't get it's act together, 2012 is Obama's
year. This dog don't hunt
August 10:
It seems that our presidential canidates like to attack their opponent with
negative and questionable personal attacks rather than campaign on their record
and/or what they can do to improve the condition of the United States. In other
words, our two party system has given us men who will run unethical presidential
campaigns who will do anything to get elected or re-elected. That includes not
telling the truth, before, and after being elected. Say what you want, but
something is not working. Mr. Obama, if you are so proud of your
accomplishments, please run on your record and quit the slim ball attacks on Mr.
Romney. Mr. Romney, if you are not ashamed of your tax records, show them to
us. It’s sad that these two are the best we can find to run for the highest
office in the land. A damn shame it is.
August 9:
If I had a thousand gallon gasoline tank I would be filling it up as fast as I
could, even at todays prices for gas at the pump. What Israel is going to to to
Iran within a short time is going to raise the price at the pump double or even
triple. Mark it down. Israel does not play
Mitt Romney-It's too late for the GOP to pick someone else to run against the
President. If the Romney campaign doesn't get it's act together, 2012 is Obama's
year. This dog don't hunt
August 10:
It seems that our presidential canidates like to attack their opponent with
negative and questionable personal attacks rather than campaign on their record
and/or what they can do to improve the condition of the United States. In other
words, our two party system has given us men who will run unethical presidential
campaigns who will do anything to get elected or re-elected. That includes not
telling the truth, before, and after being elected. Say what you want, but
something is not working. Mr. Obama, if you are so proud of your
accomplishments, please run on your record and quit the slim ball attacks on Mr.
Romney. Mr. Romney, if you are not ashamed of your tax records, show them to
us. It’s sad that these two are the best we can find to run for the highest
office in the land. A damn shame it is.
August 9:
If I had a thousand gallon gasoline tank I would be filling it up as fast as I
could, even at todays prices for gas at the pump. What Israel is going to to to
Iran within a short time is going to raise the price at the pump double or even
triple. Mark it down. Israel does not play
CSNBS's Rachel Maddow Goes After Rick Perry Today
It's clear that I don't like Rachel Maddow. I do watch her show to see what she has to say about the Conservative point of view and the various Republicans running for President. The first Republican she shot down today was Texas Governor Rick Perry. Her first twenty or so minutes were hateful toward the governor in the same way she gets on her soap box when she complains when conservative cable host chastise our President. She tried to make Perry seem crazy, out of his mind, and over the top in his actions at New Hampshire gathering. Make no mistake, I don't like Rachel Maddow. After her attack on Perry, she started in on Herman Cain. Make no mistake, I don't like Rachel Maddow. She is disgusting. Totally. And it is not because she is a liberal. I don't like her because she comes across as a know it all. In my opinion, she is a know it all idiot......savant.
Iranian Leaders Evil to the Core and THEIR Kind of Muslim Beliefs Might Be A Cover For........EVIL
Iranian Leaders Evil to the Core and THEIR Kind of Muslim Beliefs Might Be A Cover For state support criminal activity that is based on EVIL. The beating of a defenseless actress and her imprisonment in an Iranian jail for a year is not only a crime against humanity, but is based on pure evil covered by a bogus religious belief. Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad uses his religion to carry out crimes against his people and threatens other countries of the world with destruction (Israel). No better example of his ruthlessness toward others is the way the Iranian government is handling of actress Marzieh Vafamehr. 90 lashes and jail time beats stoning for sure, and that says enough about the sort of crap going on in this country. One day in the future, may it be months, or years, a final solution to the Iranian problem (for the western world) will come. Either the Israeli bombers strike first and take this Evil empire out or it will come after Mahmound Ahmadinejad shoots his first nukes at the Israeli state and then the retaliatory strike from the Jewish arsenal is followed by the United States power and turns the Iranian surface to glass and cracks the earths crust. This will happen, make no mistake about it. The leaders in Iran are crazy criminal thugs and they will push the issue to their total demise. Too bad that they will take their innocent citizens with them.
Mahmound Ahmadinejad-Iranian Leader
Mike Papantonio Shows One Side of the Ugly Coin
Radio comentator/tv analysis Mike Papantonio does not like the Tea Party. His beliefs paint the political group with a broad brush. Simpletons like Mr. Papantonio (and the conservative side has its' tools also) are bad for American as they do not bring people together. They are like trouble makers on the playground. Someone needs to take them to the principal's office for a good old busting.
Papantonio: Tea Party Still Driven By RacismWritten on September 29, 2011 in News Commentary"The tea party claims that they are a group of average citizens who just happen to oppose a lot of President Obama’s policies. They want us to believe that they are a diverse mix of people who were just fed up with the federal government. But their claims hold no truth – they are mostly a mix of old, white, angry people who are upset that a black man lives in the White House."
The tea party is not just a mix of old, white, angry people who are upset that a black man lives in the White House. Mr. Papantonio uses the race card. Where does it say that our President cannot fail because he is black. That is not fair to our President. His racial colors have nothing to do with his success or failure.
Papantonio: Tea Party Still Driven By RacismWritten on September 29, 2011 in News Commentary"The tea party claims that they are a group of average citizens who just happen to oppose a lot of President Obama’s policies. They want us to believe that they are a diverse mix of people who were just fed up with the federal government. But their claims hold no truth – they are mostly a mix of old, white, angry people who are upset that a black man lives in the White House."
The tea party is not just a mix of old, white, angry people who are upset that a black man lives in the White House. Mr. Papantonio uses the race card. Where does it say that our President cannot fail because he is black. That is not fair to our President. His racial colors have nothing to do with his success or failure.
Mike Papantoino (MSNBC)
msnbc
IS A TOOL FOR THE LIBERAL POINT OF VIEW
I watch these three major cable networks, Fox, CNN, and msnbc. One is not a news outlet.
http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2010/11/02/diversity-of-opinions-on-fox-and-cnn-while-msnbc-remains-a-no-conservative-zone/
It has become apparent that msnbc has become a tool for the liberal view and watching people like Ed Schultz, Chris Mathews and all can be a chore for anyone but a leftist. This network is bias and not a legit news outlet.
http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2010/11/02/diversity-of-opinions-on-fox-and-cnn-while-msnbc-remains-a-no-conservative-zone/
It has become apparent that msnbc has become a tool for the liberal view and watching people like Ed Schultz, Chris Mathews and all can be a chore for anyone but a leftist. This network is bias and not a legit news outlet.
 msnbc's Ed Schutz |
 msnbc's Rachel Maddow |
IF THERE IS A HEAVEN, HBO's BILL MAHER IS FRESH OUT
Bill Maher doesn't believe in God. That says it all when you listen to the man. http://news.yahoo.com/bill-maher-seriously-hates-rick-perry-205000150.html
Bill Maher
